Update IV

by | Monday, October 06, 2008

Chris from Creativity Portal dropped off a “strong” message to me on my website (see it here).

Just a couple of points. First, I have not received the email they sent me (I do not question the fact that they did send it) – just that I did not receive it. I checked my log again and did not find it.

Second, the comment suggests that I have been in a “rush to judgment” and have assumed that everybody is in this “plagiaristic conspiracy ring.” That is just not true. I have not blamed anybody but David Jiles Ph.D. and even there I have asked him to offer his take on what has happened.

Third, they say that their response was “pretty good for an average dot com Web community not in the business of peer-reviewing articles for professional publications (nor expected).” I am not sure about that. I think in the age of Google the least we can do is check up on this person – get a copy of their vita or whatever. Look at their profile on Linked in? Was that done? I don’t know.

But that is neither here nor there.

What is important in all this is what is NOT being talked about. In all this I see no concern on the part of the “average dot com Web community” to the rights of the the Root-Bernsteins.’ Their work has been completely ripped off and these people have been (inadvertently or whatever) party to this. Yet, I hear no one speak to how their life’s work has been stolen.

So I must say that the sentence, that I “have done a fine job in quickly naming and shaming innocent parties to the ‘deception’ of this author” is the one that bothered me somewhat. It is kind of ironic that protecting the rights of content creators is seen as being an unkind act.

I am sorry I did not receive the note from Chris at Creativity Portal. I would have quickly noted that they were acting on this. Let this be a statement to that effect. That is indeed the fair thing to do.

Topics related to this post: Creativity | Crime | Personal | Plagiarism

A few randomly selected blog posts…

The Postman always rings twice: Unpacking McLuhan (3/3)

The Postman always rings twice: Unpacking McLuhan (3/3)

This is the third of three blog posts about how media influence our thinking. This is the second of three blog posts about how media influence our thinking. The first post, uses the invention of writing and print to unpack the meaning of McLuhan’s statement, “The...

Silver Lining for Learning as a driver of Innovation

Silver Lining for Learning as a driver of Innovation

We recently celebrated 100 episodes of Silver Lining for Learning (see the 100th episode or read my blog post about the journey). In this process we have had an opportunity to speak with some amazing people – educational leaders, innovators, administrators, deans,...

The Reluctant Fundamentalist

An essay by Mohsin Hamid (titled My reluctant fundamentalist) about the process of writing his novel "The reluctant fundamentalist." What stands out in this piece is an excellent description of the extended and often painful act of creation - in this case a novel. I...

Plus ça change

Leigh Wolf forwarded me a link to a video commercial with the subject line saying "this is a very intriguing commercial." Of course I took a look at it right away and it was an ad for Kaplan U (on their website) ... and according to Smita it has been receiving TV time...

On making computation visible

Here is a cool video about a "a mechanical, binary adding machine that uses marbles to flip the bits" - in other words a computer made of wood, that works at a pace that we can grasp! Marvelous. (HT: Collision Detection). Check out the video: [youtube width="425"...

AI writes book reviews

AI writes book reviews

Here is the title and abstract for a book review that was just published in the Irish Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning Preparing Ourselves for Artificial Intelligence: A Review of The Alignment Problem and God, Human, Animal, Machine Abstract: In this article,...

Koehler & Mishra (2005)

One of the important papers in the TPACK sequence is Koehler & Mishra (2005). In this paper we developed and administered a survey to measure the evolution of TPACK as people engaged in a design task. This research complements our previous empirical work (Koehler,...

EduSummIT 2015: Summary Report

EDUsummIT 2015 (International Summit on ICT in Education) is a global knowledge building community of researchers, educational practitioners, and policy makers committed to supporting the effective integration of research and practice in the field of ICT in...

Links of interest

During Dr. Jalaluddin's keynote I took some time to search online for some reports, prompted by what he had been saying. (Yes I was listening not just browsing). The first is an European study: ICT in Schools: Trends, Innovations and Issues in 2006-2007. You can...

1 Comment

  1. Creativity Portal

    “I am sorry I did not receive the note from Chris at Creativity Portal. I would have quickly noted that they were acting on this. Let this be a statement to that effect. That is indeed the fair thing to do.”

    Punya,

    Thank you for that acknowledgment (check your bulk folder, it was sent twice). We have spent many hours today on this issue retooling our submission guidelines and processes and crafting a message we’ll communicate to our community on the seriousness of plagiarism.

    No, protecting the rights of content creators is not an unkind act. It is a serious priority of ours, and unfortunately, in this instance the creator’s content came from an offline book we have not read. Didn’t someone tell you that it was from a book also? How else would you have known?

    Plagiarism and copyright issues are topics we will continue to talk about and enforce at our Web site. If you “see no concern on the part of the ‘average dot com Web community’ to the rights of the the Root-Bernsteins” or any other works, then perhaps you aren’t looking deep enough. It is a huge concern of ours and of many of our partners. On every page of our Web site (header), for example, we have a copyright link that goes to this page:

    http://www.creativity-portal.com/main/copyright.html

    Our article submission page also stresses this information and has been updated today:

    http://www.creativity-portal.com/main/submit.article.html

    Our Terms of Use page:

    http://www.creativity-portal.com/main/privacy.html

    Subscribers to our newsletter will also tell you that we have stressed this information for years and have spent many hours contacting other Web site and blog publishers to remove our own content from their sites that they’ve lifted without permission and attribution. I personally know what it feels like to see others profiting from my work, so I’m highly keyed into this and agree these things need to be called out.

    My message had more to do with allowing these processes (of removing offending content) to take place in realistic time frames, which is more than one business day (be happy you didn’t have to fill out one of these DMCA forms which I had to do and sign with my own blood to get one of my personal projects removed from a ‘free web hosting’ site.)

    We agree that these issues need to be talked about and enforced. Please do give credit to Web publishers who are concerned, who are upholding these standards, and who are taking action when something like this comes to their attention.

    Thank you again for alerting us to this case and for allowing us to set the record straight.

    …and please do enjoy the cool weather and changing leaves.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *