Natural v.s. Artificial Intelligence in Teaching

by | Sunday, November 09, 2008

The field of educational technology is littered by attempts to replace the teacher by creating some kind of a technological learning system that would make the teacher redundant. All such attempts have failed. This has, however, not prevented people from trying.

This is particularly true in India, where teacher recruitment, retention and most importantly quality are immense challenges. In such a context the idea that computers can replace teachers is quite attractive. For instance, the Azim Premji Foundation spent millions of rupees in developing curricular multimedia CDs that were distributed directly to students, sidestepping the teacher altogether. Their own research shows that this tactic did not work.

Now, for someone like me, who values what teachers bring to the table, this result may not be much of a surprise. It is interesting though to find that there really isn’t much research to support my position. Such research is difficult to do – and comparisons are hard to experimentally control and study. This is why I perked up when I saw an article in the latest edition of the journal Educational Technology Research & Development.

This paper (complete citation below) reports a study that compared students learning complex scientific topics either by regulating their learning by themselves or under the guidance of a human tutor. As the paper says

learners in the ERL condition regulated their learning by activating prior knowledge, engaging in several monitoring activities, deploying several effective strategies, and engaging in adaptive help-seeking. By contrast, learners in the SRL condition used ineffective strategies and engaged in fewer monitoring activities.

What makes this finding even more interesting is that the human tutors were constrained in multiple ways from behaving like true teachers. They had to use a “tutoring script” in which they were explicitly “instructed to avoid providing the student
with content knowledge extraneous to the information in the hypermedia environment.” This was done in order to maintain experimental control between the two conditions – something that methodological sense, but does not make any kind of “real-world” sense. I wonder how different the results would have been if the tutors has NOT been constrained and made to act like computers!

Again this is not a criticism of the research study. The study is well designed within the parameters of an experimental research study. The lesson I take from it though, is that even the best designed hypermedia system does not perform as well as a strongly constrained teacher, and that is an important lesson indeed. Which is why, I guess, William James said that psychology is a science and teaching is an art!

Complete reference:
Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F. I. & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Education Tech Research Dev 56:45–72.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

New video from ITEC

I was recently at the Iowa Technology & Education Connection (ITEC) conference in Des Moines IA. I had a wonderful time meeting old friends and making some new ones. I was also asked to be part of a video that would be shared with ITEC members and other online...

National Sun Yat Sen University & Taipei

National Sun Yat Sen Unversity has one of the most gorgeous campuses you can imagine. Nestled between hills, with wonderful views of the ocean, with little twisty roads that connect departments and buildings, just beautiful. My hotel room had a magnificient view of...

Palindromic poetry: Falling Snow

A few weeks ago I had written about an email that I received from an eighth grader in Colorado. Jake, a budding poet, was interested in learning more about me in the context of some palindromic poetry I had written many years ago. I wrote back to Jake (you can see the...

David Jiles, Ph.D., Creativity Expert, Plagiarist!

I do not know who David Jiles, Ph.D. is. I do know that he is a plagiarist, an intellectual crook and a thief of the highest order! I do not write these words lightly. I was first informed of this by Mike Deschryver and have over the past few days attempted to look...

The future will not be a multiple choice test

From Chris Sloan, teacher at Judge Memorial Catholic High School and a student in our hybrid PhD program, comes a link to a TED talk. The description is as follows: Creative genius Drew Davies and forward-thinking educator Jaime McGrath propose a new approach to...

Tech Trends, Special Issue on TPACK

TechTrends is a leading journal for professionals in the educational communication and technology field and is the official publication of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology (AECT). The current issue has 5 articles devoted to the TPACK...

Arts, wellness & creativity: New article

Arts, wellness & creativity: New article

Dr. Paula Thomson and Dr. Vicki Jaque are professors at California State University, Northridge, where they co-direct the exercise and psychophysiology laboratory. They each have their own individual research interests but together they work on researching connections...

1 Comment

  1. www.intelligentgadget.com

    AI is always the best for end user. but, to find the best material in teaching is a challenge..the system should be dynamic with learning ability

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *