Plagiarism update, VI

by | Thursday, October 09, 2008

I guess this is the final update on the David Jiles, Ph.D. plagiarism saga. Those of you who came in late can get the complete picture by starting from David Jiles, Ph.D., Creativity Expert, Plagiarist!

The sequence continued as follows: Emailing a plagiarist | Plagiarism, note to Root-Bernstein’s and Creativity Portal | David Jiles plagiarism issue, update | Plagiarism, update II | Update III | Update IV | Update V

This has been an interesting experience – both in terms of tracking these issues down and seeing people’s responses to my blogging about it. Some quick updates:

First, almost all of David Jiles Ph.D.’s writings (at least those I had found on the web) have been pulled off. Some people did it just on reading my postings, while others did it after getting the Root-Bernstein’s book and checking for themselves. Those who did the latter were blown away by the extent of the plagiarism. I am not kidding when I say that this is the most blatant plagiarism I have ever (and I mean, ever) come across.

Second, most websites chose to merely delete the offending passages (as I said, usually taking me at my word, which is kind of funny given that that is how they had gotten fooled in the first place, taking someone who sent them a note at his word!). The only exception is the Young Bright Minds & Inventors Academy, who have been skeptical of my statements, and only upon realizing that what I had written was just the tip of the iceberg, did they take action. They did that in a transparent manner, posting a note on their front page (here).

Third, the book authored by David Jiles, Ph.D., on Lulu Press has been pulled off. It appears that Lulu press is refusing to reveal the contact information (apart from the gmail address which was publicly available) of Dr. Jiles. However, this is not something I have pursued, I just got this information second hand.

Fourth, I now have with me copies of lots more articles that Dr. Jiles was trying to get published. This adds to all the other articles I had downloaded on to my computer.

Finally, I have some possible background information about Dr. Jiles, that I am not revealing at this time. Anyway my interest was never in tracking him down. My goal was to have these pieces removed from public view, and due credit be given to the real authors, and I think in that I have been successful. As to whether Dr. Jiles should be charged legally I leave to others, the authors, the website owners who were directly harmed by his cheating behavior.

All in all this has been an interesting experience – and one that I have learned quite a bit from. I really wish I didn’t have to do it – but once the scope of the copying became clear there was no way one could let it go.

Topics related to this post: Creativity | Crime | Personal | Plagiarism

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Creativity online & in maker spaces

Creativity online & in maker spaces

As a part of our ongoing series on creativity, technology and learning for the journal TechTrends we recently spoke with two nationally recognized scholars: Dr. Leanna Archambault and Dr. Edward Clapp. See below for introductions to both scholars as well as...

All you can cheat, part II (a response)

Patrick Diemer commented on my previous posting, All you can cheat, the web & learning by saying: Do you have any words of wisdom or resources on how to create appropriate questions? This sounds great, but easier said than done in my humble opinion. I started...

Blast from the past: Theories and memory

Ambigram for the word "Theory" by Punya Mishra My first real research study was one that I conducted back when I was a graduate student under the mentorship of Bill Brewer. It was designed as a classic educational psychology memory study and though I have done little...

Dewey meets Wong

David Wong is a colleague of mine at the College of Education and an avid John Dewey scholar. He also loves to fish. You can learn more about his work by going to his web site here. (I had earlier blogged about his work around visually representing ideas here and...

Creativity at Wake Forest

I presented yesterday at a conference a Wake Forest University titled: Creativity: Worlds in the Making. I was part of a panel that included Robert and Michele Root-Bernstein and Todd Siler. More details about the panel and links to my presentation can be found below....

Information is beautiful

Anybody who knows me (and/or reads this blog) will know of my love of issues related to representation (see all postings under that category). So I am always looking out for new and interesting representations. An lovely example sent to me by Patrick Dickson is...

Principled Innovation meets Design: 1 new model and 2 videos

Principled Innovation meets Design: 1 new model and 2 videos

Our college has embraced the idea of Principled Innovation as being a core value that informs everything we do. (More on this in this post by Cristy Guleserian and in the PI framework document). Defining Principled Innovation: Design by Punya Mishra At the heart of...

4 Comments

  1. Ted Dunn

    Dr Mishra and others have sent me copies of David Jiles articles and it would appear that at least the one I have read consists of mostly, if not only, the words of the Root-Bernsteins and there are no citations to the original work.

    I have requested more information from David Jiles who tells me that he can clear up all of this and will send me documentation as prrof. As soon as I see that I will post my observations here.

    Reply
  2. Punya Mishra

    I have not received a note from David Jiles, Ph.D. I would have posted it right away if I had. Please ask him to send it to me again.

    In all the texts of David Jiles, Ph.D. that I have, and I have pages and pages and pages, at no time are the Root-Bernsteins’ cited or mentioned. That is a fact.

    I would recommend contacting the editor of “Young Bright Minds & Inventors Academy” who has checked the texts with the original Root-Bernstein Book. She has also emailed Dr. Jiles repeatedly and has NOT heard back from him – at least the last I had heard. That may have changed in the meanwhile. I will check with her and post it here.

    I request Dr. Jiles to email me his response again and I will post it here right away.

    Reply
  3. Ted Dunn

    I know David Jiles and have always held him in high esteem. Imagine then my horror at these revelation.

    It is important to me to get at the truth of this issue.

    David Giles has told me that in his book the paragraphs you quote are clearly referenced as work of Root-Bernstein.

    I have not seen his book. Has anyone seen it and is it the case that he has referenced the quotations?

    It seems to me that since he either has or has not referenced the material, determining the accuracy of your report is simple.

    I imagine that Lulu Press has a disk of the original manuscript and could supply that information.

    Further, David Jiles informed me that he replied to your email a few weeks ago and yet you have not posted that response which he says clears the issue.

    I would appreciate very much your posting of his response.

    Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Creativity, computers & the human soul | Punya Mishra's Web - [...] Incidentally, I took this quote from Hagemann and made if my Facebook update. It was interesting to see just…

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *