Exploring visual space with mathematics

by | Thursday, April 30, 2009

Stacy Clause just sent me this very cool link to an article titled Exploring logo designs with Mathematica. In this article, Chris Carlson, of the User Design Group at Mathematia shows how one can mathematically develop variations on commercial logo designs by the systematic tweaking of various parameters. As Chris says,

As starting points for design explorations, corporate logos are ideal. They often distill a single idea into simplified geometric form that is straightforward to parameterize in Mathematica. Once a logo is in Mathematica, exploring its parameter space quickly leads to the discovery of new graphic phenomena, emergent forms, unexpected relationships, and burgeoning lines of inquiry.

What does this mean for graphic design (and graphic designers)? Does it mean that computers can now do what we used to pay people to do? This could be grim news for designers, particularly when they are already under siege from democratizing Web 2.0 tools like CrowdSpring (whose tag line is “just post your project, watch the world submit ideas and choose the one you like”). Below are some of my thoughts on this issue.

Coming back to Carlson’s work. Go ahead and read the entire article but I would like to highlight one of his examples to make my point. For instance consider the Mercedes-Benz logo

Carlson takes this and writes some Mathematica code to re-create the logo “with some obvious parameters controlling the number of points on the star, the sharpness of the star’s points, the thickness of the outer circle, and the orientation of the star.” And then it is just a question of tweaking the parameters… And look at some of the variations he has come up with!

One could respond to this by thinking that technologies like this mean that the creative, human element has somehow disappeared! That creativity can now be programmed. What are graphic designers to do? Are they now out of jobs? Is the computer going to do everything and thus replace the graphic designer?

I am not sure that is the case. There are two important issues here that we need to think about. First, this is a great way to automatically create variations on a theme – which I have argued is the crux of creativity. However, this does not mean that humans are out of the picture totally. In fact the human steps in at two crucial points in this process.

The first is in choosing which parameters to include in writing the original code. That is not totally obvious and needs careful thought. Should you include the thickness of the outer circle? What about color? The options are large and the choices non-obvious. Setting and tweaking different parameters will lead to very different solutions.

The second place where humans step in is after all these variations have been created (and the computer creates LOTS of them). Selecting one for its appropriateness to organization for whom the logo is being designed, finding the right aesthetic look, understanding the context of use (on a website, on a car dashboard, in neon?)… all of these need human insight.

I do not mean to argue nothing will change for designers. Not at all. These new tools do have implications for how designers work, and of particular interest to me, since I am an educator, is how we train the next generation of designers. Clearly taking advantage of these new tools needs a new set of skills. For instance, programming is not something we typically teach in design school. In fact, artists and designers are often (and pardon me for stereotyping) trying to move away from mathematics. But as is clear, a designer with a good visual sense AND a knowledge of programming and mathematics is going to be much more efficient and generative (in terms of total ideas) than one with just the former.

A few randomly selected blog posts…

Visualizing periodic tables (What not to do)

Sean Nash (of Nashworld) sent me a link to A Periodic Table of Visualization Methods of Management. This is a very cool looking representation developed by Ralph Lengler & Martin Eppler at the Institute of Corporate Communication at the University of Lugano,...

The Three Oddest Words

A poem by Wislawa Szymborska Translated by S. Baranczak & C. Cavanagh When I pronounce the word Future, the first syllable already belongs to the past. When I pronounce the word Silence, I destroy it. When I pronounce the word Nothing, I make something no non-being...

Thank you, Chile!

Rotate I spent the past seven days in Chile, six days in Santiago and one in Valpariso. It was absolutely wonderful. My trip was sponsored by the Faculty of Education at the Pontificia Universidad Catolica de Chile (PUC is one of the nation's premier universities), as...

Tools “R” Us: When objects become you

Tools “R” Us: When objects become you

Danah Henriksen shared an article with me recently “When objects become extensions of you.” It is an interesting piece arguing that “Whether they are tools, toys, or mirror reflections, external objects temporarily become part of who we are all the time.” Essentially,...

Cybernetics, design & creativity

Cybernetics, design & creativity

180 degree rotational ambigram for the word "cybernetic," ©punyamishra Here is the next article in our series Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century for the journal TechTrends featuring an interview with Dr. Paul...

Banksy’s biggest trick OR why I hate art museums

I have been a fan of Banksy, the subversive British street artist, for a long time. I love the visuals he comes up with, the subversive quality of his art and most importantly his ability to take art out of the galleries into the real world. His most recent trick,...

Who said this?

A quote in today's oped in the NYTimes, about how this current financial crisis is difficult to understand since many of the decisions were taken by computer programs. The author quotes someone as follows: the human race might easily permit itself to drift into a...

Reading Obama, and getting it right!

I rarely if ever blog about politics - though I follow it avidly. I spend large parts of my day reading the news, keeping up with what is going on. Most of my news gathering happens online (the little TV I watch, usually the Daily Show, also happens online). And it is...

Principled Innovation meets Design: The video

Principled Innovation meets Design: The video

Quick summary: In which I disparage the buzzword "design thinking" even while praising the idea of design; point to the value-neutral nature of design and the need for a more principled approach, and end with a video that seeks to capture a vision of principled...

2 Comments

  1. Randal Ebsen

    Hiya,

    Fun article. Simply wanted to let you know. Design & inspiration always together.

    Reply
  2. Stace

    PM,
    Certainly an interesting take on the Mathematica site. I find Mathematica quite the reverse- that is, designs can be expressed mathematically. Given that we may only see one or two iterations of a design, its quite interesting to visualize how tweaking a function (visually)produces different patterns ( ” what happens if…”).

    I think we are starting here on different levels of expertise; Mathematica (and I recommend the site for statistical visualizations as well) as a marriage of both art, design, and math has given me much to think about in terms of how relationships are expressed in different modes, whether algebraic or visual. Imagining statistics or mathematical functions when analyzing a study ( i.e. where does the p value lie in relation to degrees of freedom, what does regression look like) seem much like the changes in the designs above and do much to improve my understanding of any design- logo or research.

    Reply

Trackbacks/Pingbacks

  1. Creativity, computers & the human soul | Punya Mishra's Web - [...] towards computers becoming partners in the creative activity itself. For instance read this post Exploring visual space with mathematics…

Leave a Reply to Stace Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *