Breaking free of academic publishers

by | Tuesday, February 12, 2008

It appears that the arts and sciences faculty at Harvard are considering publishing all their scholarship freely online. Here is a NYTimes story titled At Harvard, a Proposal to Publish Free on Web. This is truly wonderful news and long overdue. I have been doing this, at a personal level, through my website, for a long time – but have always felt a bit concerned about my legal standing. My solution has been to not make a big song and dance about it… though I have always faced questions about this at the Survive and Thrive sessions I have done for junior faculty. And I have never really had a very good answer.

I guess now I do.

According to the proposal currently being considered at Harvard, faculty members

… would deposit finished papers in an open-access repository run by the library that would instantly make them available on the Internet. Authors would still retain their copyright and could publish anywhere they pleased …[The idea would be to] create an ‘opt-out’ system: an article would be included unless the author specifically requested it not be.”

There are a couple of issues here, worth mentioning.

First, is my motivation for thinking this is a good idea. The bottom line, at least for me, is ensuring that what I write is read by as many people as possible. Since I work at a state funded university, I believe, the results of my research and scholarship should be freely available to the people who have paid for it. If Matt and I had not put our TCRecord piece out there on the web, I doubt our ideas would have received half the attention they did. People discovered the article, shared it with their colleagues and their students, and everything that has happened since then (the book, the special sessions at NTLS, SITE etc. etc.) is a consequence of its easy and immediate availability.

Second, is something I had alluded to in a previous posting (here), but would like to expand on a bit. It is interesting that it is the “big name” institutions that come out supporting these open-access initiatives (for instance MIT’s OpenCourseware and now this initiative from Harvard). I guess these institutions feel more secure in their position in the world, and thus more comfortable in sharing their information, than institutions with a weaker “brand.” Thus here at MSU we are having discussions about whether or not we should be utilizing the “cloud” for work we do here – or whether we stay cut off from the world, behind proprietary fire-walls. I had previously mentioned this article on the MSU website. Take a peek at it if you haven’t already. How backward looking is that?

Topics related to this post: Politics | Publications | Technology

A few randomly selected blog posts…

TPACK & More: Presentation at RemoteK12 summit

TPACK & More: Presentation at RemoteK12 summit

REMOTE K12: The Connected Teacher Summit, was a one-day virtual summit hosted by ASU, designed for K-12 teachers and those that support and enable teachers in district public, charter and private schools.  I presented a talk titled: Technology in teaching &...

Correlates of creativity

Just came across this on the Ph.D. design list (a listserv for discussion of PhD studies and related research in Design) from a posting by Charles Burnette. He quotes Donald MacKinnon, author of a large study on creativity in the arts, sciences and professions: If I...

TPACK Newsletter, Issue #12, October 2012

Welcome to the (long-awaited!) twelfth edition of the TPACK Newsletter! TPACK work is continuing worldwide, appearing in multiple publications, conferences, and professional development efforts. This document contains updates to that work that we hope will be...

The distance education revolution

TCRecord this week features an article by Gary Natriello titled Modest Changes, Revolutionary Possibilities: Distance Learning and the Future of Education. As the abstract says In this essay, I take stock of the developments shaping distance learning and consider the...

We feel fine about ambient findability (really?)

Most of us live our lives with the assumption of practical obscurity - i.e. the idea that what we do, even in public places, is essentially private. There are just too many people and just too few ways of tracking us individually. So we were for the most part,...

Seeing patterns with eyes closed

Oliver Sacks has a fascinating piece in today's NYTimes (titled Patterns, as a part of his NYTimes blog, Migranes, perspective on a headache). Oliver Sacks describes the visual auras he has suffered through his life as follows: tiny branching lines, like twigs, or...

Martin Gardner, RIP

Martin Gardner, 1914 - 2010 Martin Gardner died five days ago. Gardner was an influential writer about mathematics and was one of the greatest influences on me (and my friends) as I was growing up. His recreational mathematics column was the main reason I subscribed...

Failure has to be an option

I just read this great interview with Diane Ravitch on Slate.com (The wrong stuff). Diane Ravitch started out under George H.W. Bush as a strong supporter for NCLB (and all that goes with it, educational testing, school choice, charter schools etc. etc. etc.)....

3 Comments

  1. Punya Mishra

    hmmm… don’t know how to respond to the previous comment, except to say that I hope I get a scholarship too 🙂

    Reply
  2. balivillabeach

    wow..do you want to study at Harvard university? Good luck bro and I hope you can get the scholarship 🙂

    Reply
  3. Ira Socol

    I find Michigan State’s resistance to the future quite remarkable, especially considering its historic role as a Land-Grant University. One of the basic missions of this institution is “extension” – the diffusion of knowledge and research beyond the campus community. By sealing itself and its research off from the world there is the unfortunate contribution to to the notion of an imperial university – an elitist community devoted to controlling those outside of the academe rather than a liberating force.

    Beyond that is the simple stupidity of the cost. MSU and other educational institutions spend tens of millions of unnecessary dollars each year for tech support that would be better provided by third party vendors. Google accounts (replacing MSU’s truly awful 1985 email system) and Moodle accounts (replacing the bizarre Angel system) could save each MSU student between $300 and $500 per year (by my rough calculations) while providing better, faster service with dramatically improved collaborative opportunities.

    Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *